I am interested in this also.

Thank you.

 

Mitzi R. Sicking

Grant Writer

College of Engineering

University of Texas—Arlington

P: 817-272-3752

F: 817-272-2548

 

 

 

 

Good morning colleagues!

 

My institution is considering implementing internal peer review of technical proposal components for novice and/or unsuccessful PIs.  I am interested to learn from institutions with a successful peer review program and would appreciate a general overview and a description of the Research Administrators’ role (if any) in administering and/or verifying PIs’ compliance prior to submission.  

 

You can contact me directly and I’m happy to aggregate responses in a follow-up post.

 

Many thanks,

 

Julie Thatcher | Director of Sponsored Projects

Institute for Systems Biology

401 Terry Avenue North | Seattle, WA 98109-5263

P 206-732-1410 | F 206-732-2195 | xxxxxx@systemsbiology.org

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.

= = = = = =

Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "RESADM-L" link under "Sponsored Programs").

A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help

= = = = = =