Carolyn,
You make an interesting point that I am not entirely following. Can you clarify how accepting indemnification, state law, etc. contract terms under the guise of the research foundation would not be binding for
the research foundation? Isn’t it just moving the problematic clauses from one entity to another? Or is that the point? (Sorry I am not getting your point on the first swing of the bat, but I’m struggling like the Royals at this point in the season…)
Bill
William Sharp, Ph.D.
Assistant Director, Research Administration
Office of Research | The University of Kansas
2385 Irving Hill Road
Lawrence, KS 66045
(785) 864-7430 | xxxxxx@ku.edu
From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org]
On Behalf Of Carolyn Elliott-Farino
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 3:50 PM
To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org
Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Indemnification question
Russell,
Why wouldn’t this be a reason to accept the award through your research foundation? As I recall, FSU’s research foundation accepts only non-federal awards and prefers to accept federal awards through the university.
One of the reasons state universities establish research foundations is because of issues such as indemnification, state law, and insurance limits, none of which bind the research foundation. That would be a reason for your institution to make an exception.
Not accepting the award when you have a mechanism through which you can do it makes no sense to me.
Carolyn Elliott-Farino
Executive Director, Office of Research
Kennesaw State University &
Kennesaw State University Research and Service Foundation
3413 Kennesaw Hall, MD #0111
585 Cobb Avenue, Kennesaw, GA 30144
470-578-6381
From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org]
On Behalf Of Lentz, Russell
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:04 PM
To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org
Subject: [RESADM-L] Indemnification question
Has anybody had a federal agency refuse to limit indemnification to your state’s statutory sovereign immunity limits? If so, how did you handle it? Did you have to choose not to accept the award, to find someone
else at the agency, or some other alternative? We have received but not yet accepted two awards that include a FAR clause requiring FSU to indemnify without limits. The federal agency is refusing to limit indemnification despite our sending of both the Florida
statute and Attorney General Legal Opinion that limit indemnification to $300,000. Any guidance would be appreciated!
Thanks,
Russ
Russell D. Lentz
Associate Director
Sponsored Research Administration (Pre-Award)
Florida State University
874 Traditions Way
Tallahassee, FL 32306-4166
(850) 644-8649
Email secured by Check Point
<br> ======================================================================<br> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including<br> subscription information
and a web-searchable archive, are available<br> via our web site at
http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the<br> "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner)<br> <br> A link directly to helpful tips:
http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help<br> ======================================================================<br>
Email secured by Check Point
<br> ======================================================================<br> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including<br> subscription information
and a web-searchable archive, are available<br> via our web site at
http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the<br> "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner)<br> <br> A link directly to helpful tips:
http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help<br> ======================================================================<br>