Of course we can tell everyone to close Professional when they want to open
an application. But will that happen? I have my doubts. Thanks to Steve for
the scenarios — very instructive. I think it is quite logical to expect research
administrators to be able to figure this out and open the correct acrobat, but
we are going to have to remind faculty every time they are interested in
applying for something via grants.gov to shut professional and make sure reader
8.1.1 is running. Let's hope a long term solution arrives in the short term.
Thanks again to everyone who has been clarifying this for us all.
Steve, this is great!
Can we at least have a smile, that it is
possible to have
Professional 8 _residing_ on a PC with ADOBE READER
8.1.1 also
residing. And, we can be running Reader to manage an
application
with Professional residing but not open?
The frown
comes if you try to RUN professional and reader at the same
time. Or if we open Professional first.
Might a temporary
instructional solution be to tell everyone to close
Professional
anytime they want to open an application. Then open the
application with Reader? Also, as you suggest, verify what
program
is open. On my Dell, with Windows XP Pro, the actual
name of the
running program shows at the top of the window, next to
the name of
the file. Is that a special preference to
set?
Bob
xxxxxx@umich.edu
On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:27
PM, Shapiro, Steve wrote:
In lieu of all of the recent posts concerning
multiple versions of
Adobe Acrobat on the same Windows PC, I decided
to do some testing in
order to determine exactly what behavior(s)
Adobe exhibits. The
results are causing an extreme lack of the
use of my smiling
muscles :-(. What I found corroborates what Bob
posted @ 8:30 Tues
morning.
The bottom line: Please instruct
your staff who prepare proposals to
always manually verify that they
are using Adobe Reader 8.1.1 when
working on application
packages.
The procedure to manually verify the version is to open the
Help menu
option and select "About Adobe Acrobat …
"
========================================================================
=================================================
And now, for those
who are interested - the details in what I hope is
an understandable
format. I verified each of these tests on two
different
machines
I downloaded one of the Adobe Test Packages from
Grants.gov
Scenario 1: Abode Reader 8.1.1. + Adobe Professional 6.0.x on
the
same machine
Action Results
Ensured Reader 8.1.1
association I checked that Adobe
Reader
8.1.1 was the default application for .PDF files
Opened App
in 8.1.1 OK
Attempted to open App in
6.0 Error Message, would not open
Opened another pdf in 6 I
wanted to edit it and make forms changes...
Minimized 'other doc'
I need to work on a grant app
Attempted to open App in 8.1.1. Right click and
select 'Open in Adobe
Reader' It tried to open in 6.0. On
one computer, it reset my file
association for .PDF to Acrobat 6
Professional! I received an error
message when trying to open
(whew!)
Bottom Line: It
does not play nice, but I don't think App
Packages open in 6, so there
is little danger.
Scenario 1: Abode Reader 8.1.1. + Adobe Acrobat 8.0.0 on
the same
machine
Action Results
Ensured Reader 8.1.1
association I checked that Adobe
Reader
8.1.1 was the default application for .PDF files
Opened App
in 8.1.1 OK
Attempted to open App in 8.0.0
Opened without error or problem! This
is bad, but I did it to myself
:-)
Opened another pdf in Acrobat 8.0.0 I wanted to
edit it and make
forms changes...
Minimized 'other doc'
I need to work on a grant app
Attempted to open App in 8.1.1. Right click and
select 'Open in Adobe
Reader 8' It opened in Acrobat 8.0.0! This is
BAD! Really Big Frown Bad
the good news is that it did not change file
associations
Bottom
Line: We have a serious problem here. If you have a
document open in
Acrobat 8, and attempt to open another document in
Adobe Reader
8.1.1 - It will open in Adobe Acrobat 8 (not reader). If
this is an
application and you then save the file, it will become
corrupt, and
will not successfully submit.
At the University of Oregon we regard
this as a serious problem, and
are currently examining the application
packages in an attempt to
determine if we can programatically catch
corrupt application
packages prior to submission. It's a complex
process, and do not have
any results to report so far.
Steve
Shapiro
Technical Group Manager
Office of Research Services and
Administration
University of
Oregon
======================================================================
I
nstructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
via our web site at
http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv
Lists")
======================================================================
======================================================================
Instructions
on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
subscription information
and a web-searchable archive, are available
via our web site at
http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv
Lists")
======================================================================
======================================================================
Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription
information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at
http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================