Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Lawrence Waxler (10 Aug 2012 10:13 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Athey, Rochelle R [VPRED] (10 Aug 2012 11:37 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Wilhelm,Susan Marie (10 Aug 2012 12:33 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Vogrig, Cheryl (10 Aug 2012 13:13 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Sondra Redmont (10 Aug 2012 13:31 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Farnsworth, Franci (10 Aug 2012 15:18 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Rachelle Mainard (10 Aug 2012 14:03 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Hajner, John E (10 Aug 2012 12:48 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Chris Thompson (10 Aug 2012 12:55 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Tracy Eisenhower (10 Aug 2012 14:07 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Scott Niles (10 Aug 2012 14:08 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Athey, Rochelle R [VPRED] (13 Aug 2012 08:53 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Terri Maxwell (10 Aug 2012 12:58 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics (UNCLASSIFIED) Nguyen, Gauhar L CIV US USA MEDCOM TAMC (10 Aug 2012 13:30 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Lawson, Alice (13 Aug 2012 06:54 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Heidi Mina (13 Aug 2012 07:02 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Kristi Stockdale (13 Aug 2012 07:59 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Timothy Patrick Foley (13 Aug 2012 09:02 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Michael Wetherholt (13 Aug 2012 09:57 EST)
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Chris Thompson (10 Aug 2012 12:45 EST)

Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Chris Thompson 10 Aug 2012 12:55 EST

That's a GREAT idea Rochelle!   What kinds of factors are you thinking
might go into it?  I'd think number of documents, number of special
reviews, size of the budget, number of sub recipients, reporting
requirements (federal, state, etc.), number of personnel might be some
good ones to start with.

-Chris

On 8/10/2012 12:37 PM, Athey, Rochelle R [VPRED] wrote:
> We're trying to come up with a measure of complexity.  I have a draft document that splits up our award types into complexity groups from 1 the least complex to  5 most complex.  Let me know if you want a copy.  I want to add the 1-5 complexity rating to our award database and run reports from time to time on complex awards.  It's a very vague measure but it's better than what we have now (nothing).
>
> Rochelle R. Athey, CRA
> Director
> Office of Sponsored Programs Administration
> Iowa State University
> 1138 Pearson Hall
> Ames Iowa 50011-2207
> Phone:  515-294-7723
> Fax:  515-294-8000
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Lawrence Waxler
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 10:13 AM
> To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org
> Subject: [RESADM-L] Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
>
> Greetings
>
> Like all of you, our lives have become much more complex over the past few years, a trend that I do not see easing up.
>
> Looking back even five years, we didn’t have ARRA reporting, FFATA reporting, increased FCOI requirements, RCR was a smaller issue, and g.g was just cranking up, etc, etc., etc.
>
> I even remember when summer was catch-up time!
>
> However, when measuring what we do, we still rely heavily on how many proposals we process and how many awards we receive as the primary means of determining effectiveness and efficiency despite the fact that these measures do not capture life as we know it today.
>
> So…….does anyone out in grantland have any insight or perspective on how to convey that by way of performance metrics?
>
> Larry
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Larry Waxler, Director
> Office of Sponsored Programs
> University of Southern Maine
> 15 Baxter Boulevard
> P.O. Box 9300
> Portland, ME  04104-9300
> Telephone: 207-780-4413
> Telefax: 207-780-4927
>
>
>
>
> ======================================================================
>   Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including  subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available  via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the  "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner)
>
>   A link directly to helpful tips:  http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ======================================================================
>
>
> ======================================================================
>   Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
>   subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
>   via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the
>   "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner)
>
>   A link directly to helpful tips:  http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help
> ======================================================================
>

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the
 "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner)

 A link directly to helpful tips:  http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help
======================================================================