Public Access Policy - Gray zone of "Directly" Funded Burchell valldejuli (21 Oct 2011 10:44 EST)
Re: Public Access Policy - Gray zone of "Directly" Funded Sven Davisson (21 Oct 2011 11:35 EST)
Re: Public Access Policy - Gray zone of "Directly" Funded Schmitt, Andrea L (24 Oct 2011 12:51 EST)

Re: Public Access Policy - Gray zone of "Directly" Funded Schmitt, Andrea L 24 Oct 2011 12:51 EST

Hello,
For one of our P30 Center grant progress reports (which we submit in paper format),   we received guidance for all the centers that we could list these publications in a subsection of the publication list,   i.e.
"Publications resulting from work indirectly supported by the Center"
-Andrea

*~*~ Please note my new phone #, the phone prefix has changed from 876 to 832*~*~*~*~*
Andrea Schmitt
ADCC Administrative Director
and Grants Manager, Banner Research
Banner Sun Health Research Institute
10515 West Santa Fe Dr.
Sun City, AZ  85351
623-832-5628  (phone)
623-832-5461 (fax)
xxxxxx@bannerhealth.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Sven Davisson
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 9:36 AM
To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org
Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Public Access Policy - Gray zone of "Directly" Funded

For those publications that do not present research results such as review
articles, we add a note with the citation saying PMCID not applicable and
explain why.

Sven

Sven Davisson, CRA
Associate Director, Sponsored Programs

The Jackson Laboratory
600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, ME 04609
V: 207-288-6772   F: 207-288-6053

Leading the search for tomorrow's cures.

On 10/21/11 11:44 AM, "Burchell valldejuli" <xxxxxx@YALE.EDU>
wrote:

> One of our faculty has posed the below question about 'gray zone' in what may
> be considered "Directly" funded. Please read the below and let me know what
> you think..
>
> "We have encountered a new wrinkle in the pubmed compliance issue that needs
> some institutional guidance. That is, when PIs submit their progress reports,
> they are obligated to include publications directly supported by the work
> (that is obvious).  However, the common practice of PIs has been to also
> include related publications, many of which are in the grey zone as to whether
> or not one would consider the publication supported by NIH.  As an example, if
> I write a review article on the topic of the NIH grant, and my time is
> supported by the grant, I would normally include that in my progress report
> even though it is not directly supported.  Similarly, if a grant supports data
> collection for a large study, and then a grad student of mine adds on a small
> questionnaire and does an ancillary project (not really related to the grant,
> but could not have been done without having the population set up by the
> grant), her work is not directly supported by the grant but I would probab!
>  ly list her publication in my progress report.  Where this has now become an
> issue is that we are aware that pubs listed on progress reports are now being
> linked to those grants by National Library of Medicine, apparently even
> bypassing the PI.  So, the PI may have papers that appear that they have to be
> in pubmed to be compliant, when in fact that is not the case.
>
> So, we need clarity on this as it affects how our PIs should be instructed to
> do progress reports.  I think my preference would be to include 2 sections of
> pubs:  those directly supported by NIH, and those not directly supported by
> NIH but related to the grant (but we don¹t know if NIH likes this approach or
> not).
>
> CEntral G&C had to assist with a prior situation we had where some
> publications on a progress report were linked but really should not have been
> linked (the institution had to step in to undo that).
>
> We look forward to some  guidance to try to head off more of these types of
> situations
>
>
> ======================================================================
>  Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
>  subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
>  via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the
>  "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner)
>
>  A link directly to helpful tips:  http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help
> ======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the
 "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner)

 A link directly to helpful tips:  http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help
======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the
 "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner)

 A link directly to helpful tips:  http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help
======================================================================