Re: FastLane concerns Mary Watson 10 Feb 2000 08:52 EST

I have been listening (er - reading) the many statements and counter
statements about the NSF PIN vs PASSWORD announcement.  I believe Jim
Brett's comment below is very 'on-target' and I apreciate it.

When I first read the NSF message from Carolyn I ws a bit taken aback.
Then, after some thought, and before I read all the comments, I came to the
conclusion that this decision by NSF FASTLANE stemmed from a simple desire
to do what is probably not very doable, at least not as yet, secure
signatures electronically and make FASTLANE more compatable with the
Federal Commons.

I am concerned only because I want to be sure that my office still has some
semblance of control over the submission of proposals for quality, accuracy
and university appropriateness.  I don't see that changing with this
proposed adjustment but I can see that we may have to once again adjust how
we do things to be sure we can do our task effectively.  But, as Jim says,
human nature being what it is - we may have opened a very large can of worms!

Mary

At 02:28 PM 2/9/00 -0800, James R. Brett sent a message saying:
*Carolyn Miller seems to have understood the essential problem.  Many of us
have
*written to her privately about it.  In the response to Diane, below, Carolyn
*acknowledges that there is nothing that can be done to change human nature
and
*to keep faculty from sharing their [PINs or] passwords.  Given that, one
wonders
*why NSF lawyers think NSF can change human nature to achieve the goal of an
*authentic PI electronic signature?  Clearly, as other attempts to change
human
*nature in Washington have failed miserably, this one starts out hobbled and
*lame, as well.
*
*Many, if not most, sponsored programs offices have had and will continue
to find
*it necessary to know the faculty PINs and passwords.  The situation goes well
*beyond "human nature" to organizational culture and necessities of dealing
with
*NSF's imperfect Fastlane system, often in the context of heated last moments
*before the 5:00 pm "submit" deadline.  In other words, we are dealing with
much
*more than human nature.  There is a real need for sponsored programs offices'
*expertise.
*
*The problem for us is that, if the Federal Commons tries to assert the
illusion
*that an electronic signature is authentic despite the continuing truth of
human
*nature and organizational imperative, the relationship between PI and
sponsored
*program office must change.  We are not in a position to assume power of
*attorney for faculty members, and we cannot leave ourselves open to the
charge
*of misrepresenting the faculty member either.  I think NSF and Commons
*understands this, but are nevertheless willing for us to "work it out" on
*individual bases, preserving the fundamental fiction.
*
*The NSF (and Commons) goal of maintaining appropriate privacy for certain
*faculty records in federal hands is a good one.  However, this has nothing at
*all to do with the submission of research proposals.  These are not private
*transactions; they are inter-institutional as every OMB and NSF regulation
more
*or less clearly says.  The fact is that someone has thought to graft real and
*forthcoming privacy concerns (perhaps solvable by electronic "signatures")
onto
*the grant application process.  It is inappropriate and not too late to
change.
*
*Jim Brett
*
*
*
*
*Diane M Meyer wrote:
*>
*> I keep track of the PIN's as they are assigned.  I don't know how many
times
*> I've needed to look them up for PI's who forgot what it was.  It's
really much
*> quicker than having to login to FastLane and assign a new one.
*>
*> I am including a message I received from Carolyn Miller in response to my
*> question about this subject.
*>
*> -----begin message-----
*> Diane,
*> Your second alternative is what will happen - you will assign a temporary
*> password which they will have to change the next time they attempt to
log on
*> to FastLane.  It is really critical to the electronic signature project
that
*> passwords be known by only the person signing the document (although human
*> nature being what it is, there is nothing we can do to prevent the person
*> from sharing his/her password with others).
*>
*> --Carolyn
*>
*> > -----Original Message-----
*> > From: Diane M Meyer [SMTP:xxxxxx@iastate.edu]
*> > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 3:40 PM
*> > To:   Miller, Carolyn
*> > Subject:      Re: FastLane Conversion from use of PINs to Passwords
*> >
*> > Carolyn,
*> >
*> > Thanks for the update!  I can follow and support all of your points.
As a
*> > FastLane administrator, I do have one question.  I receive numerous calls
*> > from PI's asking for their PIN because they have forgotten it.  Will
there
*> > be a way for me to look it up for them or do I just have to assign a
*> > temporary one (as mentioned below) and have them login and change it to
*> > something they will, hopefully, remember next year?
*> >
*> > At 10:01 AM 2/8/2000 -0500, you wrote:
*> >
*> >       6)  if a research administrator changes an individual's password,
*> > the individual is required to change the password to something else as a
*> > part of the next log-on sequence.
*> -----end message-----
*>
*> Diane M. Meyer |-| Budget/COS/FastLane Specialist
*> Contracts & Grants, Iowa State University
*> 221 Beardshear Hall
*> Ames, Iowa  50011
*> 515-294-4567 (voice)  515-294-8000 (fax)
*> http://grants-svr.admin.iastate.edu/candg.html
*> W-W-W < =====<<
*
*--
*James R. Brett, Ph.D., Director
*Office of University Research
*California State University, Long Beach
*562-985-4833   fax 985-8665
*http://www.csulb.edu/~research
*
*
*======================================================================
* Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
* subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
* via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
*======================================================================
*
*
 "If at first the idea is not absurd,
 then there is no hope for it."
 -- Albert Einstein

Mary H. Watson, Ph.D.
Director, Grants and Contracts
Valdosta State University
Valdosta, Georgia

Phone:  912-333-7837
Fax:  912-245-3853

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================